Introduction&Methods
Introduction
A lot of
students are involved in numerous activities. Between playing sports, being in
choir, having a job, or even being in marching band, there are extracurricular
activities for pretty much anyone. Some extracurriculars can help you get into
college by looking good on applications and some are simply just for fun. The
report conducted here is Does being
involved in extracurricular activities effect GPA? A survey was done to see
the results of how students do academically when involved in various amounts of
activities. Academics can affect what you end up doing with your life and can
be a crucial part of some people’s lives. On the other hand, sometimes the
extracurricular activities someone is involved in can also determine one’s
future life. So, this leads to the question of whether being involved in
extracurriculars can affect one’s GPA, positively or negatively.
Sera
Rivers wrote about extracurricular activities and academic grades and stated
that “Various studies have shown that students who participate in
extracurricular activities excel in academic performance more often than
children who do not.” (www.classroom.synonym.com).
In this article, it is discussed that being involved in extracurriculars does
benefit one’s academic success. Being able to participate in extracurriculars
typically requires a student to do well in the classroom which also improves
attendance rate according to The National Center for Education Statistics.
Further, the article explains that being involved in extracurriculars gives you
a better GPA, improves your social engagements, and improves one’s college
opportunities.
Methods
Participants: Those who participated in this study were anyone
ages 13 and older that are taking any number of classes. They took the survey
in the fall semester of 2018.
Procedure: Those who participated were asked to complete and
online, anonymous, survey. They were asked a series of five questions about the
correlation of being involved in extracurricular activities and GPA. The first
question started the survey out simply by asking “How old are you?”, with
options of 13-15, 16-18, 19-21, 22+. The second question then went on to ask
gender, giving them options of male, female, transgender male, transgender
female, other, and prefer not to say. The third question then went onto ask
“How many extracurricular activities are you involved in? (jobs, sports, music,
etc.)”. This question had four options, 0-1, 2-3, 4-5, or 6+. The fourth
question went into further detail, asking “Are you involved in:” with the
options being sport(s), music, both, and neither. Finally, the fifth question
asked for the participants GPA, giving them ranges of 0.0-1.5, 1.6-2.5,
2.6-3.5, 3.6-4.0, and 4.1+. This survey was done through a website called
surveymonkey.com and the link was posted publicly to Facebook and Twitter and
was also posted to RHET: class blog. The survey was available to participants
for five days.
Data Analysis: The end results that were obtained by the survey
were converted into percentages. The percentages were put into bar graphs as
well as scatterplots to express the data obtained. The two questions that were
prominently important were the third and fifth question. These two questions go
into more depth to express any correlation between being involved in
extracurricular activities and GPA.
Introduction:
ReplyDelete1. I don't really understand why this topic is important from your introduction. You talk about why academics on their own are important and about how extracurricular activities on their own are important, but you don't really describe how their effect on each other is meaningful. It also seems that you only used one source, which was a non-scholarly website.
2. I think you need to specify what has already been researched and what is left to be researched. You cite a source and give the name of your study, but I think you need to go in depth about why this research gap exists and why it needs to be addressed.
3. Your introduction does not state research questions or hypotheses. (Does it need to?)
4. Language is clear and professional.
Methods
1. Good, clear headings
2. Good description of participants but maybe could use a bit more info.
3. Nice in depth procedure.
4. I don't really know how deeply data is supposed to be analyzed but I think yours is fine.